« Don't create? | Main | Interim WHOIS Solutions? »

Do we need a "fuzzy" DNS query type?

According to Kevin Murphy (pointer from Bret Fausett), Verisign is internally testing a mechanism that would return resource records in response to queries for non-existing domain names; if the query comes from a web browser, the effect would be that users are redirected to a web page that presents existing sites to them.

Users and developers are deprived of the ability to choose themselves how to deal with such a situation -- by choosing web browsers that do smart things about non-existing domain names, by configuring their web browser to feed the bad address into their favorite search engine, or by just fixing their typo.

If the query does not come from a web browser, the behaviour described just means returning wrong error diagnostics, and creating another problem to route around.

What Verisign is testing here (and Neustar has "tested" in May, in a live registry) is a fundamental breach of the Internet's most fundamental design principle. And it certainly won't improve users' surfing experience.

If Verisign was actually striving to improve user experience, then it would not overload existing query types with new and bad semantics, but would suggest a new "fuzzy" DNS query type to which a name server can respond with records that point to possibly corrected query strings -- if the user's browser chooses to ask for them.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://log.does-not-exist.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/580

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Do we need a "fuzzy" DNS query type?:

» ALAC discussing registry-level redirections of unregistered domain names. from Blogging At Large
Some recent reports about possibly planned registry-level redirection of unregistered domain names to commercial search services has lead to some discussion on the ALAC about a possible statement on this topic. Input welcome!... [Read More]

» Verisign calls it SiteFinder. from No Such Weblog
White papers on the mechanisms that Verisign apparently plans to implement for resolving unregistered domain names are available here. The service seems to have gone live now, at least for .net. Concerns here.... [Read More]

» Karl Klammer fürs Netz from Wortfeld
VeriSign bringt alle nicht registrierten com/net-Seiten unter seine Kontrolle. [Read More]

Comments (1)

Well, I have contacted sitefinder (as it is known) and let it be known that I do not accept the terms of use at th bottom of the page. Their terms of use say they can stop me for using the service without notice, yet they claim they can't stop me if I request it. See the correspondence at www.hahaha.com.au/weblog

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on September 9, 2003 10:38 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Don't create?.

The next post in this blog is Interim WHOIS Solutions?.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.35