Ken Stubbs: Blueprint an additional step in the right direction of funding and staff for stable operation. Agree with NomCom and streamlining. Need additional clarification about increased per-registration fee. [audio gap] Need judicative contract interpretation and enforcement. Proposals weak in this regard.
« NC: Reform Discussion (1) - ccTLDs. | Main | NC: Reform Discussion (3) - NCDNHC »
NC: Reform Discussion (2) - registrars.
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://log.does-not-exist.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/480
Search
About
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on June 26, 2002 12:48 PM.
The previous post in this blog was NC: Reform Discussion (1) - ccTLDs..
The next post in this blog is NC: Reform Discussion (3) - NCDNHC.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.35
Movable Type 3.35